tnf α (Dakewe Biotech Co)
Structured Review

Tnf α, supplied by Dakewe Biotech Co, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/tnf+%CE%B1/pmc13261649-322-5-12?v=Dakewe+Biotech+Co
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "A safe and anti-inflammatory plant-derived nanovesicle platform for targeted delivery in acute lung injury"
Article Title: A safe and anti-inflammatory plant-derived nanovesicle platform for targeted delivery in acute lung injury
Journal: Bioactive Materials
doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2026.03.033
Figure Legend Snippet: The anti-inflammatory effect of the nanoparticles in vitro (a) The proportion of CD86 M1 and CD206 M2 in RAW264.7 cells by flow cytometry. (b-c) Level of inflammatory cytokines IL-6, TNF-α and IL-10 in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7 cells (b) and MH-S cells (c) after different treatments (n = 5). (d-e) NF-κB p65 nuclear translocation observed by CLSM (n = 5). ①control group; ② PBS treated group; ③ LEVs treated group; ④ GRb1 treated group; ⑤ GRb1@LEVs treated group; ⑥ GRb1@LEVs-cRGD treated group. (f) The protein expressions of key members in the NF-κB pathway by Western blot, including the phosphorylated (p-p65) and basal NF-κB p65, p-IκBα, and IκBα (n = 3). (g) Heat map showing the hierarchical clustering results of the DEGs detected between LPS group and LPS treated with GRb1@LEVs-cRGD group. DEGs were identified based on a fold change greater than 1.5 and an adjusted P-value less than 0.05. (g) Gene Ontology (GO) term enrichment analysis was performed, and the top 30 significantly enriched GO terms were selected based on an FDR <0.05. (h) Top 20 enriched pathways identified using Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis of DEGs in cells triggered with LPS. (i-j) Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) images. (l) Schematic illustration of the mechanism in the reprogramming of RAW 264.7 cells by GRb1@LEVs-cRGD.
Techniques Used: In Vitro, Flow Cytometry, Translocation Assay, Western Blot
Figure Legend Snippet: GRb1@LEVs-cRGD alleviated LPS-induced lung injury and inflammatory responses in the lung. (a) Schematic illustration of animal experimental design. (b-d) lung wet/dry ratio (b), levels of protein (c), total cell number (d) in BALF in LPS induced ALI mice treated with PBS, LEVs, GRb1, GRb1@LEVs, GRb1@LEVs-cRGD (n = 5). (e-h) Level of IL-6 and TNF-α in BALF (e) and serum (h) of mice after different treatments (n = 5). (i-j) Representative H&E images of lungs after different treatments (i) and the corresponding analysis of lung injury score (j) (n = 5). (k) Lung tissue analysis TUNEL staining in each group (n = 5). (l-n) The distribution of tight junction proteins, ZO-1 and VE-Cadherin, by immunofluorescent staining in lung tissues and corresponding quantification.
Techniques Used: TUNEL Assay, Staining
Figure Legend Snippet: TIG/GRb1@LEVs-cRGD alleviated Kp NDM-induced lung injury and inflammatory responses in the lung. (a) Experimental design of in vivo assessment using a Kp NDM-induced model. (b) Growth curves of KP NDM co-incubated with various preparations (n = 3). (c) Corresponding quantification of bacterial load in lung tissue homogenate (n = 5). (d-e) Lung wet/dry ratio (d) and levels of protein (e) in Kp NDM-induced ALI mice treated with PBS, TIG, TIG/GRb1@LEVs-cRGD and negative control (n = 5). (f-h) IL-6 (f) and TNF-α (g) IL-1β (h) of BALF in above groups (n = 5). (i-j) Representative H&E images of the lung after different treatments (i) and corresponding lung injury score analysis (j) (n = 5). (k-p) Immunofluorescence staining images of IL-6 (k) and corresponding quantitative analysis (n), TNF-α (l) and corresponding quantitative analysis (o), IL-1β(m) and corresponding quantitative analysis (p) (n = 5).
Techniques Used: In Vivo, Incubation, Negative Control, Immunofluorescence, Staining
Figure Legend Snippet: Vanc/GRb1@LEVs-cRGD alleviated MRSA-induced lung injury and inflammatory responses in the lung. (a) Experimental design of in vivo assessment using a MRSA-induced model. (b) Growth curves of MRSA co-incubated with various preparations (n = 3). (c) Corresponding quantification of bacterial load in lung tissue homogenate (n = 5). (d-e) Lung wet/dry ratio (d) and levels of protein (e) in MRSA-induced ALI mice treated with PBS, Vanc, Vanc/GRb1@LEVs-cRGD and negative control (n = 5). (f-h) IL-6 (f) and TNF-α (g) IL-1β (h) of BALF in above groups (n = 5). (i-j) Representative H&E images of the lung after different treatments (i) and corresponding lung injury score analysis (j) (n = 5). (k-p) Immunofluorescence staining images of IL-6 (k) and corresponding quantitative analysis (n), TNF-α (l) and corresponding quantitative analysis (o), IL-1β (m) and corresponding quantitative analysis (p) (n = 5).
Techniques Used: In Vivo, Incubation, Negative Control, Immunofluorescence, Staining




